Binance’s Cost Cutting Measures Revealed in Internal Email, Contradicting Executives Statements

Picture Source: BeInCrypto

A recent Twitter thread by Adam Cochran, a partner at Cinneamhain Ventures, has brought to light an internal email from Binance, shedding new light on the recent wave of layoffs at the cryptocurrency exchange. The email appears to contradict public statements made by Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, who claimed that the staff reductions were primarily aimed at securing the right talent. Cochran’s post has sparked discussions and raised questions about the real motives behind the layoffs, suggesting that cost-cutting measures may have been a significant factor.

The Email’s Allegations:

According to the internal email revealed by Cochran, Binance acknowledged the challenging “current market environment and regulatory climate” as factors that have unfortunately led to a decline in profitability. The email further outlined the implementation of cost-cutting measures, including the reduction of extended benefits such as mobile phone reimbursements and an 8-year child allowance. Binance hinted that additional measures to reduce expenses might be introduced in the future.

Contradictions and Speculations:

The revelations in the email contradict the statements made by CEO Changpeng Zhao, who previously denied that cost-cutting played a significant role in the layoffs. Cochran’s post directly challenges Zhao, questioning why the email states that the layoffs were not only about cost-cutting but also due to a decline in profit. The Twitter thread has sparked debates within the crypto community, with many speculating on the true motives behind the staff reductions at Binance.

Ongoing Investigations and Regulatory Challenges:

The emergence of the internal email adds another layer of complexity to Binance’s current situation. The cryptocurrency exchange is currently facing investigations by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and has also been charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for various reasons. These investigations and charges have contributed to the challenging market environment mentioned in the email and likely influenced Binance’s decision to implement cost-cutting measures.

Layoffs and Management’s Response:

Last week, Binance laid off approximately 1,000 employees, with the customer support team bearing the brunt of the staff reductions. Changpeng Zhao defended the layoffs by stating that the aim was to retain the “right talent and expertise in critical roles.” He emphasized that the departure of some senior executives was merely a result of media misinformation and denied any widespread cost-cutting efforts. Zhao’s remarks also included reassurances that Binance continues to hire new talent.

Customer Compensation Claims and Outflows:

Further complicating Binance’s situation, an entity called Eeon, representing Binance customers, has filed for compensation against both Binance and the SEC. Eeon claims that the SEC and Binance’s legal representatives failed to adequately represent the interests of the customers. Seeking compensation equivalent to 20% of the daily value of withheld funds per customer, the entity demands $1,000 per day. Binance experienced significant outflows of approximately $8 billion after the SEC filed its lawsuit.

Read More: Circle’s USDC Stablecoin Faces Decreasing Circulating Supply, Challenged by Competitors


The disclosure of an internal email from Binance has cast doubt on the motives behind the recent layoffs, suggesting that cost-cutting may have played a more significant role than initially claimed by the exchange’s executives. Binance’s ongoing legal challenges and regulatory investigations have undoubtedly affected its profitability and prompted the implementation of cost-cutting measures. As the crypto industry continues to face increased scrutiny, the true reasons behind Binance’s staff reductions may become clearer in the coming weeks.