In the wake of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s recent four-day tour of Colombia, Piers Morgan has spoken out against what he perceives as a controversial move by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
The couple’s visit, which concluded on Sunday, has reignited debates about their role and influence on the global stage, with Morgan leading the charge in criticizing their actions.
Speaking to The Sun, Morgan did not mince words about his disapproval.
“Meghan and Harry aren’t real royals these days,” he said. “So, what gives them the right to prance around the world pretending to be proper royals, on quasi-official visits? There are so many things wrong about this.”
Morgan’s comments reflect ongoing tensions and skepticism regarding the Sussexes’ public engagements since stepping back from their official royal duties.
Critics like Morgan argue that Harry and Meghan, now private individuals with no formal royal responsibilities, lack the legitimacy to conduct what some perceive as royal-like tours.
The Colombia trip, intended to promote various charitable causes and engage with local communities, has been described by Morgan as an attempt to maintain a royal facade rather than a genuine, impactful mission.
The tour included several high-profile events and meetings aimed at raising awareness for various social issues, including education and mental health.
Harry and Meghan met with local leaders, participated in cultural exchanges, and used their platform to spotlight important causes.
Despite these efforts, Morgan and other critics have questioned the authenticity and effectiveness of their approach, arguing that it falls short compared to the royal family’s official engagements.
In contrast to Morgan’s critique, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams offered a more positive assessment of the visit.
Speaking to GB News, Fitzwilliams described the Colombia tour as a “success” in terms of enhancing the Sussexes’ “international profile.”
He defended the trip as a valuable use of Britain’s soft power, suggesting that the Sussexes have effectively leveraged their global platform.
“This is a positive royal tour, and it’s one of the best ways that Britain projected its soft power,” Fitzwilliams explained. “The Sussexes have jumped on the bandwagon.”
Fitzwilliams’ perspective highlights the differing views on the role and impact of Harry and Meghan’s global activities.
Read More: Kensington Palace Issues Major Update Amid Kate Middleton Cancer Treatment
While Morgan and others remain critical of their efforts, Fitzwilliams believes that their actions contribute positively to Britain’s global image and their personal brand.
The contrasting viewpoints underscore the complex and often polarized opinions about the couple’s post-royal life and their attempts to influence public discourse on a global scale.
The Sussexes’ visit to Colombia marks another chapter in their ongoing efforts to balance their personal and professional lives while navigating the challenges of their new roles outside the royal family.
Their activities are likely to continue drawing both praise and criticism, reflecting the broader debates about their place in the royal narrative and their influence on global issues.
As Harry and Meghan move forward with their philanthropic and public engagement efforts, the scrutiny and debate surrounding their actions are expected to persist.
The reactions from figures like Piers Morgan and Richard Fitzwilliams highlight the diverse and often contentious perspectives on the couple’s role and impact, offering insight into the broader discussions about modern royalty and celebrity influence.
