Donald Trump’s political re-emergence and strategic appointments to key U.S. government positions have sparked speculation about potential implications for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
The former president’s influence looms large, especially after his nomination of South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem to lead the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
This move has raised concerns for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who may find themselves facing new challenges under her leadership.
Richard Eden, a commentator from the Daily Mail, recently shared insights on Palace Confidential, where he argued that Trump’s decisions might send “shivers down the spines” of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Eden pointed to the couple’s past legal battle involving the Heritage Foundation, which demanded the public release of Harry’s U.S. visa documents.
The case, initiated by the conservative think tank, centered around allegations that Harry’s admissions of past drug use—revealed in his memoir Spare—could have disqualified him from obtaining a U.S. visa.
Typically, individuals with a history of substance abuse face significant hurdles when applying for permanent residency or even temporary visas in the United States.
The Heritage Foundation’s case aimed to determine whether Harry had been truthful in his visa application process.
When applying for entry into the U.S., applicants are required to disclose any history of drug use, and lying on official documents can have severe consequences, including visa revocation or denial.
However, in a decision that some perceived as lenient, the DHS under its previous leadership ruled that Prince Harry’s visa details should remain private, citing privacy concerns and rejecting the foundation’s demands for transparency.
This ruling allowed Harry to maintain his U.S. residency without public scrutiny over whether he had received special treatment.
Kristi Noem, Trump’s pick for DHS, is a figure known for her assertive leadership style and conservative values.
Eden speculated that Noem’s approach might differ significantly from her predecessor’s, suggesting that she may not show the same level of leniency in matters involving high-profile individuals like Harry and Meghan.
Describing her as a “no-nonsense figure,” Eden predicted that Noem’s tenure could lead to renewed scrutiny of Harry’s visa status, particularly if the Heritage Foundation pursues an appeal to overturn the initial ruling.
Under Noem’s leadership, the DHS might adopt a stricter stance on issues of transparency and accountability, potentially revisiting decisions perceived as favoring high-profile applicants.
The Sussexes, who have faced intense public and media scrutiny since stepping down as senior royals in 2020, could be further impacted by these developments.
Meghan, a U.S. citizen, would not face visa-related challenges, but Harry’s residency could come under threat if the Heritage Foundation successfully reopens the case or if the DHS opts to review his immigration records.
Losing his U.S. residency would be a significant setback for Harry, as the couple has built their life in California with their two children, Archie and Lilibet.
Read More: King Charles and Queen Camilla’s Alleged Love Child Breaks Silence on His Birth
Moreover, such a scenario could disrupt their business ventures, philanthropic activities, and overall stability.
Adding another layer to the narrative is Donald Trump’s own history of criticism toward Harry and Meghan.
Trump has openly voiced his disapproval of the couple’s treatment of the late Queen Elizabeth II and their decision to step back from royal duties. He has also dismissed Meghan as a “nasty” person in past interviews.
Given this history, the Sussexes might perceive Trump’s political resurgence as a potential threat to their current lifestyle and public image.
Eden’s comments further highlight the couple’s precarious position, especially as Trump and his allies appear poised to reshape key government institutions.
While the Heritage Foundation’s case represents just one of many challenges the Sussexes have faced, it underscores the complex web of legal, political, and public relations hurdles they continue to navigate.
If Noem takes a hardline stance on immigration transparency, Harry may need to prepare for further scrutiny of his past admissions and legal status.
On a broader scale, these developments could impact the Sussexes’ ability to maintain their residence and pursue their endeavors in the U.S.
As high-profile figures who have faced both adulation and criticism, Harry and Meghan may need to brace themselves for heightened public and legal challenges under a potential Trump administration.
In the meantime, observers will closely watch how the DHS under new leadership responds to the Heritage Foundation’s appeals and whether this case becomes a litmus test for how the U.S. government handles high-profile immigration matters.
For Harry and Meghan, the stakes could not be higher, as their American dream hangs in a delicate balance.
