In recent years, the British media landscape has been embroiled in a puzzling saga involving Prince William, his wife Kate Middleton, and their alleged relationship with Rose Hanbury, the Marchioness of Cholmondeley.
Reports from various sources reveal that at least 21 stories, originally published between 2019 and 2024 in prominent U.K. publications such as the Daily Mail, the Sun, the Mirror, and Tatler, have mysteriously disappeared from public view.
Additionally, six other stories were reportedly edited post-publication to remove content deemed unfavorable to Hanbury or her connections to the royal family.
The deleted and edited stories alluded to rumors of an alleged affair between Prince William and Rose Hanbury, as well as reports of a strained relationship between Hanbury and Kate Middleton.
These reports have sparked renewed speculation about the dynamics within the royal family and their interactions with the British press.
Ellie Hall, author of the investigative report for Vulture, described how these stories, once a part of extensive coverage surrounding Hanbury and her ties to the House of Windsor, have vanished without explanation.
Despite efforts to erase them, remnants of these articles persist in broken links within the archives of the publications and on their official social media accounts, underscoring the haphazard nature of the cleanup attempt.
The controversy surrounding these deleted stories has raised questions about potential pressures exerted on the British media by the royal family.
Critics argue that the removal of these articles may suggest attempts to suppress unfavorable coverage or protect the royal family’s public image from scandalous rumors.
The origins of the rumors themselves date back to 2019, with speculation and gossip circulating about a possible romantic entanglement between Prince William and Rose Hanbury.
These speculations gained traction in both U.K. and international media circles, fueled by references to a supposed “rural rivalry” between Hanbury and Middleton among the aristocratic circles of Norfolk, where both families own estates.
Despite the widespread coverage and public interest, no substantial evidence has ever emerged to substantiate the affair rumors.
In fact, some reports that were not deleted explicitly dismissed the rumors as baseless, citing lack of evidence and characterizing them as unfounded gossip.
The saga took a turn in March 2019 when public attention surged following comments made by American late-night host Stephen Colbert, who humorously referenced the rumors during a monologue.
This incident coincided with a period of public scrutiny regarding Kate Middleton’s prolonged absence from public appearances, which was later attributed to her diagnosis and treatment for cancer.
Read More: Royal Expert Weighs In on Unlikely Reconciliation Between Prince Harry and Prince William
Rose Hanbury herself has publicly denied any romantic involvement with Prince William, issuing statements through legal channels to rebut the allegations and challenge media narratives surrounding her relationship with the royal couple.
Despite these denials, her public appearances alongside the royal family, including high-profile events and ceremonies, continue to fuel speculation and tabloid interest.
As the controversy persists, observers remain divided on the motivations behind the deletion of these stories and the implications for press freedom and royal relations.
The British press, long intertwined with the monarchy’s public persona, faces scrutiny over its handling of sensitive royal matters and the extent to which it operates under external influences.
In conclusion, while the deleted stories may no longer be accessible, their existence in the public consciousness and the ongoing discourse surrounding them underscore the complex interplay between media coverage, celebrity, and the enduring fascination with the British royal family’s private lives.
