In a move that has shocked royal watchers and stirred emotions online, the British royal family’s official social media accounts remained silent on the anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II’s coronation—prompting outrage and confusion among her loyal fans.
Despite June 2 marking the historic day in 1953 when the young Queen, just 25 years old at the time, was formally crowned at Westminster Abbey, no tributes were posted by Buckingham Palace, Kensington Palace, or any other official royal channels.
The lack of acknowledgment did not go unnoticed. As fans flooded X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram with heartfelt tributes and throwback images of Her Majesty in full coronation regalia, many questioned why the family failed to mark such a meaningful occasion.
“Why no post? This was the beginning of a 70-year reign,” one user commented. “The silence is deafening.”
Another wrote, “Queen Elizabeth II gave her entire life to duty, and yet not a single tribute on the day that started it all? It’s beyond disappointing.”
Elizabeth II’s coronation came more than a year after her ascension to the throne on February 6, 1952—following the death of her father, King George VI. The lavish ceremony at Westminster Abbey was televised, drawing millions of viewers across the world and ushering in a new era of monarchy after World War II.
Many royal fans expected at least a small tribute to mark the date—especially given Queen Elizabeth’s extraordinary legacy as the longest-reigning monarch in British history. Her reign spanned over 70 years and saw her break records set by her great-great-grandmother, Queen Victoria.
But it wasn’t just her reign that set her apart. Queen Elizabeth was a constant symbol of stability during decades of immense change—from the decline of the British Empire to modern political and cultural revolutions. Her marriage to Prince Philip lasted 73 years, and together they raised four children: Charles, Anne, Andrew, and Edward.
Following her passing in September 2022, the monarchy entered a new chapter under King Charles III. Yet moments like this raise questions about how the current royals are preserving the legacy of the woman who held the throne for more than seven decades.
Critics of the monarchy have suggested that the omission could be intentional—perhaps a decision by Charles’s team to shift the spotlight fully to the new reign. But for many, that explanation does little to ease the sting.
“Paying tribute doesn’t detract from Charles,” one fan posted. “It honors the woman who made it possible for him to sit on that throne.”
The silence has also led some to reflect on the growing distance between the royals and the public. As royal support fluctuates amid scandals, controversies, and generational divides, moments of remembrance—especially for someone as beloved as Queen Elizabeth—serve as crucial touchpoints to unite people.
Historically, the royal family has marked important anniversaries, including birthdays and jubilees, on social media, often sharing never-before-seen photos and heartfelt captions. That pattern makes this year’s omission feel particularly stark.
It also adds fuel to a larger concern royal watchers have expressed in recent months: that Queen Elizabeth’s memory is quietly being moved aside in favor of a more modern, streamlined monarchy.
Still, many fans took it upon themselves to ensure her legacy was honored. Across social platforms, tributes poured in, with users sharing photos, speeches, and clips from the 1953 coronation.
“She wasn’t just a monarch. She was the monarch,” one tribute read. “There will never be another like her.”
As the royal family navigates its future, one thing is clear—Queen Elizabeth’s legacy lives on not through silence, but through the millions who still hold her memory dear. And they’re not staying quiet about it.
