Allegations surrounding King Charles III and Queen Camilla have long been the subject of royal conspiracy theories and speculation.
Among the more controversial claims is the existence of an alleged “love child” born during their younger years before their marriages to other partners.
The individual at the center of this claim, Simon Charles Dorante-Day, has spoken out publicly on multiple occasions, shedding light on what he believes is a “cover-up” surrounding his birth and early childhood.
Simon Dorante-Day, a 57-year-old Australian, has consistently claimed that he is the biological son of King Charles and Queen Camilla.
He alleges that he was conceived during the couple’s relationship in the 1960s when Camilla Shand (now Queen Camilla) and Charles were young adults.
Simon, who was adopted as an infant, asserts that his adoptive grandparents worked for the British royal household, which he believes connects him to the royal family.
Over the years, he has publicly demanded DNA testing to prove his claims, a request the royal family has not acknowledged.
In a recent Facebook post, Dorante-Day revealed a new layer to his story, focusing on an alleged incident where his eye color was deliberately changed during his childhood.
He stated that his adoptive mother, Karen, disclosed to him in 1998 that his eyes changed from blue to brown when he was eight years old, around 1974.
He recounted, “My adopted mother Karen told me herself in 1998 that my eyes ‘changed’ from blue to brown when I was eight years old.”
Karen reportedly confirmed this timeline when Simon asked her to verify the year. She shared similar details with Simon’s wife, Dr. Elvianna, on multiple occasions.
Simon connected this eye-color change to an incident in 1974 involving Princess Anne.
At that time, Anne narrowly escaped an attempted kidnapping, an event that Simon speculates might have influenced decisions within the royal family to “act” on his situation.
Simon vividly recalled the physical pain and discomfort he experienced during this period, stating, “It’s not something you forget, the pain, the irritation, my eyes were so red and swollen for six months.”
He believes that the alleged tampering with his eye color was part of an effort to obscure his royal lineage and alter his appearance to disconnect him from Charles and Camilla.
The alteration, if true, raises questions about the lengths to which Simon claims the royal establishment may have gone to protect its image and maintain secrecy about his existence
Dorante-Day’s life has been marked by public awareness of his claims, and he has faced significant challenges as a result.
In his Facebook post, he detailed ongoing legal battles, including a case against the Queensland Police Service for what he describes as “continued breach of duty.”
“For nearly four years now, we’ve been forced to endure this treatment,” he wrote. Simon alleges that he and his family have faced harassment, abuse, and threats due to his claims of royal parentage.
Read More: Kate Middleton’s Savage Reaction to Meghan Markle’s Joke at Major Royal Event
Despite these challenges, he remains resolute in his pursuit of legal action and public acknowledgment of his story.
While Simon’s allegations have gained attention globally, there has been no public response from King Charles III, Queen Camilla, or the royal family regarding his claims.
Simon’s repeated calls for DNA testing have been met with silence, leading to further speculation and frustration among his supporters.
Simon has often emphasized that his pursuit is not about wealth or status but rather about uncovering the truth of his origins.
He has said, “This is about being recognized for who I am and setting the record straight for my children and future generations.”
Simon Dorante-Day’s allegations, though unverified, touch on themes that resonate beyond royal intrigue: identity, family, and the search for truth.
His story has fueled ongoing debates about transparency and accountability within the monarchy.
Whether or not his claims hold merit, the controversy underscores the enduring fascination with royal lives and the potential secrets they hold.
It also highlights the challenges faced by individuals who, rightly or wrongly, believe themselves connected to institutions as scrutinized and secretive as the British royal family.
As Simon continues to share his story and pursue legal avenues, the case remains a point of contention and curiosity for royal watchers worldwide.
The resolution of his claims, if it ever comes, could significantly impact public perceptions of the royal family and its historical legacy.
