Sarah Ferguson is facing what many are calling her most difficult chapter yet, as fresh setbacks threaten to leave the former duchess with little left to hold onto. The ongoing controversy linked to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and renewed scrutiny over connections to Jeffrey Epstein have once again shaken royal circles.
The scandals surrounding Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and Ferguson have undeniably rocked the Palace in recent years. Their past association with Epstein altered the dynamics within the institution and placed intense pressure on senior royals including King Charles and the Prince and Princess of Wales.
While being named in the Epstein files does not automatically imply criminality, critics argue that certain evidence cannot be easily dismissed. The reputational damage alone has proven significant, particularly for figures already under public scrutiny.
Ferguson and Andrew Mountbatten Windsor’s past controversies have also left a visible mark on their daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Royal observers suggest this period has ushered in an era of introspection and recalibration within the wider monarchy.
Now, new reports indicate that Ferguson’s own admission regarding emails exchanged with Epstein has triggered serious financial consequences. According to documents filed with Companies House, six businesses connected to the former duchess are in the process of being wound up.
Ferguson is listed as director for all six firms, each facing removal from the official register within ten days unless a legal objection is raised. The filings suggest that these entities could soon cease to exist altogether.
The true nature of the companies’ operations remains unclear. Most appear to have been largely dormant, showing minimal trading activity and limited commercial engagement in recent years.
Company records reveal that five of the businesses include an application to strike the company off the register. This formal step indicates they will stop trading permanently and be dissolved under UK corporate law.
Read More: King Charles Brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Detained Over Secret Documents Scandal
Ferguson remains the sole director for each of the firms being closed, intensifying questions about her financial standing. Despite these closures, she continues to hold active directorships at three other companies registered with Companies House.
Beyond corporate setbacks, Ferguson has also experienced a wave of distancing from charitable organisations. Seven charities have already removed her as a patron or ambassador in the wake of renewed controversy.
Julia’s House was among the first to take action, stating it was inappropriate for her to continue in the role. The decision marked a turning point in how charities responded to mounting public concern.
Other organisations including Teenage Cancer Trust, Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, Children’s Literacy Charity, National Foundation for Retired Service Animals and Prevent Breast Cancer also confirmed they had dropped the duchess as patron. Meanwhile, British Heart Foundation announced she would no longer serve as its ambassador.
The cumulative effect of company dissolutions and charity withdrawals has left Ferguson’s public standing significantly weakened. For a figure once deeply embedded in philanthropic and commercial ventures, the losses represent a dramatic reversal of fortune.
Questions now swirl about how she will cope with the growing financial pressure. Rumours have already begun circulating that Ferguson could consider writing a revealing memoir in an attempt to reclaim relevance and rebuild her public image.
Whether such a move would restore credibility or deepen divisions remains uncertain. For now, Sarah Ferguson faces a stark reality as the aftershocks of the Epstein scandal continue to reverberate through her personal, professional and royal life.
